WE WANT YOUR INPUT on Fightful Championship Rules
Added 2019-06-26 16:15:45 +0000 UTCSo it's hardly a secret that we have the Fightful Championship at the office now, and planned on using it in the 24/7 format well before. We're going to kick that off, but wanted to share a tentative rule outline. Let us know what you would change, nix, keep, or add!
* camera must be present (need video proof of a title change)
* don't need a referee, only a third party willing to count a pin or submission
* compensation (supposedly) to answer why anybody would want that title
* whoever is champion at the stroke of midnight each day gets financial incentive. And whoever has the title for the most minutes each day gets financial incentive"
Comments
Either way it already sounds more structured than WWE’s 24/7 title AND wild card rule combined
CWX5
2019-06-27 21:17:02 +0000 UTCWho all is eligible? And who defines eligibility?
2019-06-26 19:34:06 +0000 UTCLosing the title twice (or more) in a 24 hour period is grounds for punishment, as voted on by the members of Fightful Select.
2019-06-26 18:22:21 +0000 UTCHow about whoever is pinned cannot win it back from the same person who just beat them for it? They have to wait for (or help) someone else to win it before they get another shot.
Graham Williams
2019-06-26 16:25:11 +0000 UTCWinning the title one time could be a condition of employment.
Donald Gold
2019-06-26 16:24:18 +0000 UTCThe few things comes into my mind I want believe in a good old school wrestling match and I don't want no bad booking or bad story telling . at the end of the day I'm one of those types want buy into a story and love it
Tim Traver
2019-06-26 16:21:19 +0000 UTC
