same old stuff, In her case replace women, or we by I.
borei
2020-03-26 14:49:13 +0000 UTC
great job Alexander. I share your videos all the time. you truly are an inspiration and the way you handled this just further demonstrates how well you know your stuff and the truth! keep it up
2019-11-28 16:28:26 +0000 UTC
I can't describe how happy I am with how well you handled that. Kudos.
Kadz
2019-11-27 17:40:06 +0000 UTC
One of the main arguments I've heard for why homosexuality hasn't been selected out is because homosexuals still help their siblings reproduce, even if they don't reproduce themselves. I've also met teachers who never wanted children and never had them, yet loved their students and they definitely helped their students become more successful, which results in a higher chance of reproduction. So I'd agree that not having children is not unnatural.
At first glance I disagree with the statement "facts are not always objective", though I'd have to know how you define "fact" and "subjective" to be sure. But that sentence isn't really needed for your argument.
Natural would be anything that leads to higher reproductive success. So, if couples who don't love each other are having more kids that then reproduce themselves than those who do, then that would be natural. If not, then that would be unnatural.
Ryan Stallard
2019-11-27 11:24:39 +0000 UTC
This was.... Well... Why engage with someone who uses marvel character name instead of their own name? That tells a lot.
Alexander is not really as right as he think he is. There is no doubt we are biologically inclined to mate and reproduce. However, not having children is not unnatural and does not in itself constitute trauma. I actually think this very natural for a global civilization. Is this not unnatural? Well it has been present and documented throughout time in all advanced CIVILIZATIONS. Have and not having are defined by each other. That woman is one messed up individual. As a therapist I can see dissociation in this individual.
Facts are not always objective. I've met people who are in tune with their biology, they know themselves and for whatever don't have children. Yet they are in tune, intuitive and genuine and I'm yet to mean one such who does not love children.
I see couples having children yet not loving each other. Is that natural? To me is unnatural. That leads to trauma. And this is a fact. Shall we go toe to toe Alexander? I bet I'll can fair better than this woman.
Hristo
2019-11-27 10:00:57 +0000 UTC
Dude, she's a complete moron and most likely a miserable Lara Croft wannabe XD.
2019-11-27 04:03:46 +0000 UTC
updated with the next part of our exchange
Alexander Grace
2019-11-27 01:23:29 +0000 UTC
Women lose their ability to produce healthy eggs at around 40 years of age. Women live to be at least 80. What will they do in the span of those 40 years when all their female friends have kids, grandkids and lives of their own?
2019-11-27 00:19:43 +0000 UTC
Bee in her bonnet
2019-11-27 00:07:24 +0000 UTC
That poor woman... trying to paint you as an irrational misogynist instead of a social scientist who makes arguments based on overwhelming facts rather than anomalies and statistical outliers...
Margaret
2019-11-27 00:06:01 +0000 UTC
All I see is a disagreement. You got your point across very well.