XXX4Fans
law from patreon
law

patreon


Sneak Peek of the Introduction to the OA Amicus Brief

Check out our statement of interest and introduction!  Comments welcome.

Comments

Ok from the updates I see this changed a lot. I’ll refrain from that kind of grammatical suggestion until the very end

Crockpot

Nitpick from a layperson who doesn’t know how these things are done typically: the very last sentence says “a criminal defendant that” but I think it should be “a criminal defendant who” since he is still (probably) a human person. Could also be “whom” since he’s the subject of that lesser clause but part of the object of the sentence as a whole. Never been great about that.

Crockpot

As a lay person, footnote at best, I don't think it adds anything to your credibility, as the author of the Amicus brief.

Dan from Deerfield


Related Creators