2060 Testing
Added 2019-02-04 05:03:06 +0000 UTCIt's too fast! (for a 2060). But it costs $100 more! Gaaaaaaah. Let me know if we made any egregious mistakes. New helper for benchmarks and organization.
:D
Some 2070 reviews coming up too..but... its so fast?
Weird.
wendell
Comments
Aren't most legitimate reviewers just reviewing game performance? Take into considering GPU unbias rendering done in the film industry and in render farms along with game developers and VXF studios. I don't work in deep learning or compiling code so can't speak for that but It's a good price : performance for production. I just wish we weren't stuck with CUDA to do this stuff.
2019-02-07 11:08:36 +0000 UTC$399 USD (or canadian dollars if you go used) for Vega 56 just picked one up recently, it's alright but the VFIO reset bug is irritating.
Biking With Panda
2019-02-07 03:28:50 +0000 UTCThe statement in the first six seconds of this video was so out of left field and a direct contradiction of every other legitimate reviewer’s take on this card (that isn’t just parroting Nvidia’s marketing materials about how it’s faster than a 1070 Ti) as well as Turing in general that I had to replay it several times listening for a hint of sarcasm. It’s not there, and I’m massively disappointed. It’s only $2/mo, but I’m pulling my support. This review did not feel like it was on the side of consumers—at all—nor aware of the grander deficiencies of Turing price:performance ratio across the line compared to prior generations at the same price point and model number. This was a disturbingly huge miss on your part.
Jason D.
2019-02-04 21:07:49 +0000 UTCHow much does vega 56 go for now?
2019-02-04 14:32:54 +0000 UTCCool, but... If you hate nvidia cards for their generally shoddy (and closed) linux drivers, what would be your team red alternative?
Glenn Steen
2019-02-04 06:55:07 +0000 UTC