Reaching goals
Added 2017-08-05 22:45:36 +0000 UTCHey everyone,
As some of you may have noticed, this Patreon page recently passed one of the goals I put out several months ago. Specifically, here's how it was described.
It's around this point that I'd start considering expanding beyond just me to help create more series in more topics.
Truth be told, you all caught me off guard a bit with how quickly this happened! True to the cautious phrasing of the goal, though, it is now something I'm starting to contemplate more seriously :)
First, let me just say one more time how much this support means to me. The financial aspect of it is obviously one component. But beyond that, it's both heartwarming and reaffirming to know that a meaningful number of people out there align with the goals I have for the channel β enough to allocate some portion of their disposable income to ensure not just that it exists, but that I can take the time to make each video something we all can all feel proud of, and which best serves the channel's mission of exposing what genuinely doing math feels like. Not just in descriptions of what exists, but with deeper dives into the problem-solving process.
So getting back to the goal, I've had the vague sense that there will come a time when this mission is best achieved with more hands on the creation process. The softest form of that has already begun, with the input many of you have offered on the early release of series videos. The more hefty form, of course, would come in the form of a full-time hire.
The move from one person to multiple is definitely not to be taken lightly, so I want to take care to be sure it's done in the right way. The benefits of more man-hours can easily be outweighed by the drawbacks of communication overhead when tasks are not distributed properly. So it may still be a few months before there is another contributor on the video creation side of things, but I feel comfortable saying that it is in the plans.
If you'll indulge my musings on the topic, I'll share a few thoughts.
My instinct is that the wrong way to play this is would be to subdivide and contract out aspects of an individual video, especially the standalone ones. Creative works by individuals have a clearly different taste from those produced by teams. While neither is intrinsically better than the other, for 3blue1brown videos the video conception, writing and animations are not really distinct parts but intertwine tightly with one another, so it'll probably always be best individual videos to be primarily owned by an individual.
For example, I've talked with other creators who outsource the animation side of things, and it's clear just how inefficient that process can be, and there is always a disjointed feel between the writing and the visuals in the final outputs. For this channel, quite often the visual is the substance, so forcing that tight alignment could be very unwieldy if it rested on a back and forth between writer and animator. If that were the process, the Riemann Zeta Function video I did would never have existed.
Instead, it's probably best to give someone a fuller ownership of entire videos, where my role would be one of guidance, offering approval on the video conception and script, and narrating. Perhaps they would even have ownership for an entire series.
As I said, it might take some time to really shape the role I want, and to find the right person. Also, there are some legal aspects where I need to get all my ducks in a row. But it's exciting to me to know that this channel has a less hazy future than in did 9 months ago, and that the long list of topics I'd like to make series on may one day be fully covered.
Thanks again, and keep loving math.
-Grant
Comments
A video on Maxwelll's equations could be really fun, especially as an excuse/motivation to talk about div and curl. "Math as language" as always been a very thought-provoking idea to me. I'm not sure I'd ever make a video to that effect, but it certainly does make for fun discussions.
3blue1brown
2017-12-17 21:02:49 +0000 UTC2nd try... You have a good approach to communicating math. Entertaining with the little PI Guy, set to music with good illustrations and animations. I like to ask you to consider looking into explaining how Maxwell transformed the observations of Faraday (and a few others) into his four remarkable equations which set the stage for modern science. I'd would also like to discuss a view of teaching and learning as mapping process, the role of language in that process and a view that mathematics is a family of language that strive for precision enabling greater accuracy in the communication of what is in our thoughts.
Tom LaFleur
2017-12-17 14:15:20 +0000 UTCHi Grant,
Tom LaFleur
2017-12-17 13:40:30 +0000 UTCHey, guys! Does exist in mathematical point of view, a slope on a Black Hole surface? #Veritasium #3Blue1Brown #TheGoodStuff #PBSSpaceTime π
2017-08-27 16:59:31 +0000 UTCNot splitting the work but rather delegating a series to another creator by keeping the spirit/style of the channel seems like the right move to me. I think the future of maths education will rely on maths videos like yours more than people think. There should be more mathematicians creating content of this kind and quality. However, since this requires doing more than a simple step in the making process, I imagine the requisites you might have in mind must be quite high. The person must be a mathematician with similar clarity when understanding, visualising and communicating maths. They also need to be able to make the animations (using their own tools, or otherwise they should be familiar with your python library). Furthermore, they must have thought of topics on their own or you would need to choose topics which you could comfortably hand to them. But most importantly they must be dedicated and passionate as you are. Regardless of this, I think this is an opportunity. If you happen to have some ex-colleague (perhaps from Stanford?) who you really trust and that meets these requirements, we could have a second source of high quality maths videos, which could provide with different insights and cover different branches of mathematics than the ones you have been covering/are planning to cover, and that's very exciting.
2017-08-09 22:45:21 +0000 UTCkeep up the good work
Illuminati Games
2017-08-08 03:07:54 +0000 UTCI've actually started doing something very loosely along these lines. It'd definitely something I'd like to get more into.
3blue1brown
2017-08-07 00:03:23 +0000 UTCYou should pay some web developers to make interactive versions of your animations.
2017-08-06 21:51:06 +0000 UTCGood work
Illuminati Games
2017-08-06 16:14:06 +0000 UTCAnother option (that I think wasn't mentioned) is to hire more of an administrative-type position. This is what e.g. successful authors will tend to do IMO, they usually don't outsource the actual writing, but they do outsource a lot of the administrative overhead around it.
Edan Maor
2017-08-06 07:58:35 +0000 UTCI did watch your bit on Kahn Academy regarding the Jacobian. It was good. I have a idea that would be wonderful to see animated. It has to do with non-Euclidean geometry and a total of 10 Elements that reduce to 3 elements that are scalar covariant. If you would be interested in doing something with this please let me know. The idea involves QM and GR. I'm not looking for any compensation at all. This is only for education and mathmatics. And avoiding singularities.
Bill Russell
2017-08-06 04:11:44 +0000 UTCI just have to ask you, on what software do you do your videos? Or on which languaje do you program. About hiring someone, I think you should get someone to investigate other topics and write a script that you would edit. That way, the videos are still yours. Even having someone get their own videos is a great idea, it can be someone that has a speciam love for that topic and has done plenty of research.
Oscar Ivan Miranda Alcocer
2017-08-06 02:01:01 +0000 UTCHey Grant, congratulations on reaching your goal.
Oscar Ivan Miranda Alcocer
2017-08-06 01:57:59 +0000 UTCThanks Max, it's nice to hear you say that. I don't want to lose that either :). In truth, even at Khan Academy, you can kind of feel the tendency to slip into a "group creation" feel without a conscious effort to make it otherwise.
3blue1brown
2017-08-05 23:58:28 +0000 UTCI'll let you all know when I have more clear goals :). As to getting someone to help with the software, that is a possibility. But honestly, I'm pretty quick in my own little environment, and for at least some things I create, it might take more time to write out the specs for exactly what I want than it would to just bang it out. You're right that it's something to think about, maybe for fundamentally different animation types...
3blue1brown
2017-08-05 23:56:24 +0000 UTCThe most plausible option I see there is that of editing sound and aligning with existing animations. Honestly, though, I've already automated some of the more mundane aspects of that part, so it's not really that much time.
3blue1brown
2017-08-05 23:52:24 +0000 UTCThanks Bill. Great point about one-time investments, I certainly would hate to over-scope things. At the same time, though, if involves work from another person, I'm hesitant to add a source of uncertainty in their life. Khan Academy used a lot of contractors for a while, and a big downside was that many were left feeling unsure about their own future.
3blue1brown
2017-08-05 23:50:47 +0000 UTCI was literally typing this same comment when yours popped up, remm! There's lots of good stuff outside of that episode as well. I highly recommend Cortex to you, Grant. Both hosts have had to expand their businesses, and there's plenty to learn from their experiences. It's worth noting that CGP Grey also heavily intertwines his animation with his writing, but still manages to make a separate animator work (and the audience would never have noticed). Your case might be even harder, but it's definitely worth not being too timid about. In any case, the easiest roles to add would be personal assistant, accountant, and lawyer. They're jobs that aren't worth your creative time, and you wouldn't have to worry about whether they'd mess with the quality of your work.
Okuno Zankoku
2017-08-05 23:50:19 +0000 UTCGrant, the thing I love about your videos is that they combine the polish (animations, rehearsed script) with the feeling that it's *one guy* and not an institution behind it (which is perhaps the one good thing about a Khan Academy video, except he's an institution now so...). I want to encourage you to keep your videos personal and find your own spin on topics. I know, for example, that some of the Essence Of videos are in an order different than a traditional textbook, because of your informed opinion and deep contemplation of the topic and how to teach it. I wouldn't want to lose that touch.
Max Goldstein
2017-08-05 23:40:00 +0000 UTCAre you going to add more goals? Also I agree that it may be worth investing some of the money to get someone to fix any issues you have with the software you use to make the videos or to make you the software you wish you had. :)
2017-08-05 23:36:15 +0000 UTCCGP Grey does a podcast called Cortex, and for a few episodes they discussed the hiring of an animator for his videos, up until that point all his videos had been entirely his own work. It sounds like much the same of what you're thinking about at the moment. <a href="https://www.relay.fm/cortex/28" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.relay.fm/cortex/28</a> If you're interested, the episodes were 28, 29, 30 and 31
remm
2017-08-05 23:30:47 +0000 UTCHow much time is spent on programming the animations and would it help if the tools for that would be better? Maybe you could get a developer/programmer/interaction designer type to work on that and even make a well-maintained open source package. Then again, the things you do are pretty specialised and case-by-case I guess. EDIT: I should have read the other comments first, Nicholas Sterling said almost the same thing!
Job van der Zwan
2017-08-05 23:12:32 +0000 UTCI wonder whether there are opportunities to make your life easier by investing in, or writing, more potent software tools. If so, I would probably try to exhaust that reservoir first before hiring. But I'm surprised that there isn't *some* aspect of the video production that couldn't be farmed out to make your life easier. It wouldn't have to be a full-time position, would it?
Nicholas Sterling
2017-08-05 23:05:39 +0000 UTCAs you know all things change over time. But who and what you are, and do, is unique to you and you alone. Short term hires may be an option. Contract type work. Or investment in physical assets that make your work load lighter may be the way. Either way both are a one time investment. Not based on unknown future possibilities. I will continue supporting you as long as the content is of value to me and I am able. Oh I have no disposal income. LOL. You are a teacher and coach! Thanks for doing it!
Bill Russell
2017-08-05 23:00:30 +0000 UTC