Goonmanji 2 - 117 - HD
Added 2018-05-03 05:17:39 +0000 UTCOf course Rhoda shrunk Tom and his friend down to 1/3 their normal size. Why wouldn't she?
My love of having size changes be math determined resulted in me deciding Lucy would wind up half-sized, but with a particular part of her remaining full sized. I think I would have preferred this if she just evenly shrank all around, but I didn't know that until I tried it.
In any case, BUNNY! Hop hop hoppity
Comments
I really like this idea of partial shrinking.
Merle Blue
2018-05-04 19:25:48 +0000 UTCMore like squishing than shrinking, like Tedd said with the variable watches?
BJ
2018-05-03 21:48:03 +0000 UTCApplying the Conservation of Mass? When one thing shrinks, two things have to get slightly larger...
James C
2018-05-03 16:42:46 +0000 UTCThis is quite satisfying. Thank you.
McZed
2018-05-03 13:50:03 +0000 UTCJust because they're transformed doesn't mean they're not jerks anymore.
Stephen Gilberg
2018-05-03 13:43:48 +0000 UTCI can think of no other reason.
Stephen Gilberg
2018-05-03 13:43:26 +0000 UTCI've never been a real fan of shrinking, but this is a variant I think I like. :)
M.
2018-05-03 12:13:31 +0000 UTCLucy: "well, well, well~ if it isn't little Rhoda~. hey, have you gotten even SMALLER lately~?" Rhoda: "tell you what. I'll show you smaller~ but you're allowed to keep the one part of you I like at full size."
Connie Edogawa
2018-05-03 09:48:54 +0000 UTCI like the (x 1/2 - DD) Having a greater reduction with some addition so she'd be stuck there a while would be nice too
ZekeStaright
2018-05-03 06:23:09 +0000 UTCThis is a very yummy page! So much to like! Is he blowing those fans at her in panel 1 because she's "hot"?
coredumperror
2018-05-03 06:11:28 +0000 UTCTom's off-panel, but it's a safe assumption given panel one here.
Dan Shive
2018-05-03 05:24:23 +0000 UTCI don't think Tom Tom is in this one
Doomed
2018-05-03 05:22:15 +0000 UTC
